And they say gun permit holders watch too much TV

A Knoxville restaurateur had this to say about the restaurant carry legislation:

"What if his gun was taken from him and then somebody else had possession of that firearm? There are just all types of scenarios that can happen,"

What if, indeed. So, when the aggressor is trying to disarm a presumably innocent person, the presumably innocent person is therefore at fault for bringing a weapon to protect himself from people like this? How much sense does that make?